GATEHOUSE
The comprehensive gazetteer and bibliography of the medieval castles, fortifications and palaces of England, Wales, the Islands.
 
 
Home
The listings
Other Info
Books
Links
Downloads
Contact
 
Print Page 
 
Next Record 
Previous Record 
Back to list 

Car Colston Manor

Also known as, or recorded in historical documents as;
Willoughby Manor; Hall Close

In the civil parish of Car Colston.
In the historic county of Nottinghamshire.
Modern Authority of Nottinghamshire.
1974 county of Nottinghamshire.
Medieval County of Nottinghamshire.

OS Map Grid Reference: SK71694235
Latitude 52.97379° Longitude -0.93379°

Car Colston Manor has been described as a Timber Castle but is rejected as such, and also as a probable Fortified Manor House.

There are earthwork remains.

This site is a scheduled monument protected by law.

Description

Remains of an entrenchment south east of Car Colston Manor House (SK 717994237). Also, remains of a moat south east (south west must be intended) of Car Colston Manor House (SK 71694235) (VCH).
SK 71694235 Motte and Bailey. SK 71714228 Flood Bank mutilated in 1914 ((H O Houldsworth) Corr 6" June 1953).
SK 71694235 Moat (NR) 'Motte and Bailey' claimed by Houldsworth is unsupported. AP's show a well defined moat. The entrenchment at SK 71794237 appears to have evolved from a furrow in a well defined area of rig (RCHME Recorder NC 28-JUL-1972).
Willoughby's Manor stood on the square moated site in Hall Close, Occupied by 1280, demolished C16th/C17th (Blagg 1970).
The earthworks are set in permanent pasture and comprise a small, nearly rectangular moat, embanked on the SW and SE sides. A shallow, rig and furrow field boundary ditch, parallel with NE arm and 12.0m. from it, suggests a small outer enclosure, and probably stimulated the erroneous idea of a motte and bailey. RAF AP's show trees on the island. These are now gone and some degradation of the surface has resulted. A channel to the NW also shows, but this has been filled and the moat itself has also attracted some dumping. The straightening of a small stream beside Micklemoor Lane has produced a bank of upcast c 120.0m. long which has become confused with a drain channel from the moat, the 'flood bank' noted above. Other banks and ditches to the E are old rig and furrow field boundaries or roads. Published 25" survey revised (F1 BHS 16-SEP-74).
Hall Close. A survey was made of the earthworks in 1977. (see illustration). On the east side of the moat a partly filled in rectangular hollow was probably an associated fish pond. (Referred to as a ridge and furrow boundary ditch by F1). In the north-east corner of the site ('E' on plan - at SK 71854261), three small depressions are probably a set of (? fish) ponds. On the west side of the western boundary of the enclosure ('D' on plan), are two small banks (at about SK 717142-52) which are probably old croft boundaries, although no trace of house platforms was noticed. The bank and ditch in the south part of the field ('F' on plan), has been identified as the "Ring of the Village", referred to in the tithe award of 1843. It was an earthwork which surrounded the village before the enclosure of 1598 (O'Brien 1977).
Car Colston is Colestone in the Domesday Book of 1086 (EPNS). (PastScape)

A moated site and other linear earthworks are shown by the OS. Other earthworks have been recorded by aerial survey. The earthworks were surveyed in April 1977 (within the scheduled area). The bank and ditch (L8309) has been identified as the "Ring of the Village". It was an earthwork which surrounded the village, separating the homesteads from the fields before the enclosure of 1598 (O'Brien 1977).
Extensive settlement earthworks including ridge and furrow, field boundaries, crofts and building platforms (see element records for details). (TPAT 1995)
Overall the earthworks are in very good condition and all the elements are clearly visible. (Nottinghamshire HER)

The shrunken village remains at Car Colston are a well-preserved example and illustrate well the diversity of the component features of this class of monument, including as they do such elements as a moated manor house, fishponds, a town ring, a millpond and leat, ridge and furrow and a postmill mound in addition to the sites of peasant dwellings and other buildings and a number of deserted crofts. The minor Romano-British villa remains also survive well. Villas were extensive rural estates at the focus of which were groups of domestic, agricultural, and occasionally industrial buildings. The term 'villa' is now commonly used to describe either the estate or the buildings themselves. The buildings usually include a well-appointed dwelling house, the design of which varies considerably according to the needs, taste and prosperity of the occupier. Most of the houses were partly or wholly stone-built, many with a timber-framed superstructure on masonry footings. Roofs were generally tiled and the house could feature tiled or mosaic floors, underfloor heating, wall plaster, glazed windows and cellars. Many had integral or separate suites of heated baths. The house was usually accompanied by a range of buildings providing accommodation for farm labourers, workshops and storage for agricultural produce. These were arranged round or alongside a courtyard and were surrounded by a complex of paddocks, pens, yards and features such as vegetable plots, granaries, threshing floors, wells and hearths, all approached by tracks leading from the surrounding fields. Villa buildings were constructed throughout the period of Roman occupation, from the first to the fourth century AD. They were usually complex structures occupied over several hundred years and continually remodelled to fit changing circumstances. They could serve a wide variety of uses alongside agricultural activities, including administrative, recreational and craft functions. Villa owners tended to be drawn from the elite of Romano-British society but, although some belonged to immigrant Roman officials and entrepreneurs, most seem to have been occupied by wealthy natives with a more or less Romanised lifestyle and to have been built directly on the site of Iron Age farmsteads. They provide a valuable index of the rate, extent and degree to which native British society became Romanised and serve to illustrate the agrarian and economic history of the Roman province.
This monument at Car Colston is a complex multi-period site which includes the site of a minor Romano-British villa, a moat, six fishponds, ridge and furrow, a postmill mound, a leat, a boundary bank and ditch, part of the earthwork remains of the shrunken or shifted medieval village, a millpond and a hollow way. Additional village earthworks survive elsewhere in Car Colston but have not been included in the scheduling as they are separated from it by modern development. Not included, except where they encroach on the area of the scheduling, are a number of ditch-like features extending from the modern field boundary along the south-east side of the monument. It is not known precisely how these relate to the Roman and later remains but, as examples overlie part of the medieval ridge and furrow, it is assumed they are relatively recent in origin. The moat, which occupies the west corner of the monument, surrounds two islands, each island measuring c.20m square. The moat is on average c.9m wide and between 1m and 2m deep except on the south side where is is 10m wide and over 2m deep. There is no moat along the north side of the easternmost island. Also, the moat along the east side, whilst up to 2.5m deep at its south end, levels out to ground level at its north end. This indicates that access to the moated site would have been from this side and that this part of the moat may originally have been fenced. Slight earthworks in the ditch between the two islands appear to be grassed over spoil and possibly originate from an unrecorded excavation. The moat round the south side of the site is revetted on the outside by a bank measuring c.5m wide by 0.75m high. To the west it merges with a second bank which extends along the west side of the moat and continues southward to form the east side of a linear fishpond varying between 10m and 20m wide and 100m long. Alongside the moat it also forms the east side of a second fishpond measuring 20m wide. The original length of this pond is uncertain as it has been truncated to the north by features belonging to the modern farm. The west side of both ponds is formed by another continuous bank and the two are divided by a transverse bank broken at the south-west corner by a sluice. Additional sluices on either side of the transverse bank also join both fishponds to the moat. A third fishpond exists 25m to the south and is similar to the first in that it is a long, linear embanked feature. However, its original dimensions are uncertain because, to the west and south, it has been disturbed by modern land use. It was, however, at least 100m long and extended into the modern ploughed field to the south-east. Roughly 10m to the east are the remains of a fourth fishpond. Only the north end of this pond survives as a sunken feature measuring 9m wide by 10m long. The remaining two fishponds are associated with the junction of the south and east arms of the moat and are much smaller than the ponds to the west. The first is east of the junction and measures c.6m by 8m. The second, which is a sub-rectangular embanked feature c.2m deep, is linked to the moat by a 10m long channel and measures c.10m by 13m. Extending eastwards from these two ponds is a pronounced headland which forms the southern limit of a block of plough ridges left by medieval ridge and furrow ploughing. There are six ridges in the block, each c.6m wide and orientated roughly north to south. Running parallel along the east side is a well-defined leat or water course measuring c.10m wide by 1m-1.5m deep. This leat is 270m long and was originally fed by a stream flowing north of the monument. It extends for a further 70m beyond the end of the ridge and furrow and empties into a roughly triangular pond which measures between 20m and 30m per side and is c.2.5m deep. At the junction of the headland and the leat is a roughly circular mound with a diameter of 7m and a height of a little over 1m. This feature has been interpreted as a postmill mound. However, as it has clearly been used to mark the limit of ploughing, it may be a much earlier feature such as a Bronze Age bowl barrow which was re-used during the Middle Ages. East of the mound and leat, there is a second block of ridge and furrow which extends further southwards than the first block, ending on a headland just north of the triangular pond. This pond is interpreted as the site of a manorial watermill since it is too distant from the village earthworks to be considered a village pond and rather closer to the moated manor and its associated fishponds. In addition to the leat which approaches from the north and was the mill race, it is entered by two less substantial ditches: one from the west which connects it to the fishponds and one from the east which flanks a boundary bank that extends from the pond into the adjacent field. There may also have been a boundary bank alongside the ditch to the west at one time, but this ditch is overlain with a ridge and furrow which post-dates it and may have ploughed such a feature away. The boundary bank, which is quite distinct from the ridge and furrow headland north of it, extends eastwards for 130m then turns at right-angles northwards delimiting the ridge and furrow. The ridge and furrow thus enclosed overlies and therefore post-dates a complex of indeterminate earthworks which may be associated with the medieval village or possibly with the villa site which lies to the north-east. The bank extends northwards for 60m then ends at a cluster of earthworks which have the appearance of building platforms disturbed by later ploughing. A second boundary bank and ditch approaches these earthworks from the east and turns at right-angles southwards before it reaches them. In this way, a 10m wide corridor is formed between the north- south sections of each bank and this acts as a gateway between the area north of the boundary, which contains the earthwork remains of the medieval village, and the area to the south which was part of its open field system. A further block of ridge and furrow lies south-east of the boundary, ending on a headland and flanked on its west side by a sunken track or hollow way which approaches from the south and passes through the corridor into the village. This type of medieval earthwork boundary, extending round the limits of a village, is sometimes known as a town ring. Though it now ends on the modern field boundary along the north-east edge of the monument, its former extent is preserved in the hedgeline along the backs of enclosures south of Car Colston green. The village earthworks preserved within the town ring, and on its north side, include numerous small enclosures, building platforms and sunken floors, and, along the north side of the monument, bordering the green, three parallel banked enclosures which represent the crofts or burgage plots of individual homesteads. These contain faint traces of tofts or house sites and are bordered, along the south side, by a hollow way representing a back lane behind the village. Faint ridge and furrow partially overlies the crofts and hollow way, implying that this part of the settlement may have been abandoned in the late medieval or early post-medieval period. Another complex of well- preserved building platforms lies just within the town ring in the eastern part of the monument and is the site of a close-knit group of Roman remains. These include two distinct buildings arranged round two sides of a courtyard. One building covers an area measuring 22m x 23m and includes three separate rooms divided by robbed wall trenches. Orientated north to south, it is set c.10m west of the second building which is orientated east to west. The second building is also made up of individual rooms divided by robbed out walls and from its layout, has been identified as a Romano-British villa of the 'winged corridor' type. It has a rectangular plan, the north half consisting of a line of four rooms of which three measure 4m x 6m and the fourth 6m square, flanked to the east by a larger room measuring 15m x 2.5m and are interpreted as private rooms, while the larger room will have been the dining room; traditionally the best room in a Roman house. East of the corridor are two reception rooms, each measuring 6m square and with a threshold apparent between the westernmost and the corridor. Outer walls can be traced south of the corridor and north of the bedrooms, and also encircling the north-east corner of the dining room. The building range to the west, if it is contemporary with the villa, will have housed ancillary features such as kitchens or possibly a bath suite. (Scheduling Report)
Comments

The moat is small but is manorial so, arguably, comes into the classification of fortified manor house.
The identification of a motte and bailey here seems to have been rejected almost immediately, it hasn't been made by any castle studies expert.
Links to archaeological and architectural databases, mapping and other online resources

Data >
PastScape   County HER   Scheduling        
Maps >
Streetmap   NLS maps   Where's the path   Old-Maps      
Data/Maps > 
Magic   V. O. B.   Geology   LiDAR   Open Domesday  
Air Photos > 
Bing Maps   Google Maps   Getmapping   ZoomEarth      
Photos >
CastleFacts   Geograph   Flickr   Panoramio      

Sources of information, references and further reading
Most of the sites or buildings recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner or tenant.
It is an offence to disturb a Scheduled Monument without consent. It is a destruction of everyone's heritage to remove archaeological evidence from ANY site without proper recording and reporting.
Don't use metal detectors on historic sites without authorisation.
The information on this web page may be derived from information compiled by and/or copyright of Historic England, County Historic Environment Records and other individuals and organisations. It may also contain information licensed under the Open Government Licence. All the sources given should be consulted to identify the original copyright holder and permission obtained from them before use of the information on this site for commercial purposes.
The author and compiler of Gatehouse does not receive any income from the site and funds it himself. The information within this site is provided freely for educational purposes only.
The bibliography owes much to various bibliographies produced by John Kenyon for the Council for British Archaeology, the Castle Studies Group and others.
Suggestions for finding online and/or hard copies of bibliographical sources can be seen at this link.
Minor archaeological investigations, such as watching brief reports, and some other 'grey' literature is most likely to be held by H.E.R.s but is often poorly referenced and is unlikely to be recorded here, or elsewhere, but some suggestions can be found here.
The possible site or monument is represented on maps as a point location. This is a guide only. It should be noted that OS grid references defines an area, not a point location. In practice this means the actual center of the site or monument may often, but not always, be to the North East of the point shown. Locations derived from OS grid references and from latitude longitiude may differ by a small distance.
Further information on mapping and location can be seen at this link.
Please help to make this as useful a resource as possible by contacting Gatehouse if you see errors, can add information or have suggestions for improvements in functality and design.
Help is acknowledged.
This record last updated 26/07/2017 09:21:02

Home | Books | Links | Fortifications and Castles | Other Information | Help | Downloads | Author Information | Contact
¤¤¤¤¤